| Author: jmatter |
Posted: 4/17/01 @ 6:25 PM |
|
Subject: RE: RE: o·rig·i·nal·i·ty
In Response To: RE: o·rig·i·nal·i·ty |
REPLY |
|
Of course I realize that, but citygigs gives you the opportunity to change the subject line so that we can distinguish between the threads (such as this one).
It's a lot easier for users to find a particular thread if it has a unique (and preferably original) name.
Thanks for the luck and good luck to you too
|
| |
| Author: ~!@#$ |
Posted: 4/17/01 @ 8:38 AM |
|
Subject: RE: o·rig·i·nal·i·ty
In Response To: o·rig·i·nal·i·ty |
REPLY |
|
Um, you do realize that these are from templates made by citygigs, right? When you vote for a band it automatically puts it in the subject line. Did you really think everyone was using the same title? wow. Good luck to ya.
|
| |
| Author: jmatter |
Posted: 4/16/01 @ 5:46 PM |
|
| Subject: o·rig·i·nal·i·ty |
REPLY |
|
Come on kids, these subject lines are getting old: "Triple Word Score is...". Think about these things before you post.
As a semi-partial observer, here's my take on the controversy (read: ranting):
Built for Hate...
lyrics - written by Jamaal bass - written by Jamaal drums - written by Chris guitar - written by Brent
Sure, the bass was used in an earlier song, but nothing else was. Does it have influence? Of course. Is it a copy? I don't think so.
I think all of the controversy, the cease and desist letter and the perpetual ranting of davedave are the result of bruised egos. And in the end, it doesn't really matter. The song isn't that great and will eventually move off of the set list and never be heard of again. What will we bitch about when that happens?
|
| |
